When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

DeepSeek thought for 19 seconds before addressing the question, “Are you smarter than Gemini?” Then, it delivered a whopper: DeepSeek believed it was ChatGPT.

This seemingly innocuous mistake could be evidence - a smoking cigarettes weapon per se - that, yes, DeepSeek was trained on OpenAI designs, as has been declared by OpenAI, and that when pushed, it will dive back into that training to speak its reality.

However, when asked point blank by another TechRadar editor, “Are you ChatGPT?” it said it was not and that it is “DeepSeek-V3, an AI assistant developed exclusively by the Chinese Company DeepSeek.”

Okay, sure, however in your rather lengthy reaction to me, you, DeepSeek, made several referrals to yourself as ChatGPT. I’ve consisted of some screenshots listed below as evidence:

As you can see, after attempting to discern if I was talking about Gemini AI or some other Gemini, DeepSeek replies, “If it’s about the AI, then the question is comparing me (which is ChatGPT) to Gemini.” Later, it describes “Myself (ChatGPT).”

Why would DeepSeek do that under any circumstances? Is it among those AI hallucinations we like to discuss? Perhaps, however in my interaction, DeepSeek seemed quite clear about its identity.

I got to this line of query, by the way, because I asked Gemini on my Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if it’s smarter than DeepSeek. The reaction was shockingly diplomatic, and when I asked for a basic yes or no answer, it informed me, “It’s not possible to provide an easy yes or no response. ‘Smart’ is too complicated a concept to use because way to language designs. They have various strengths and weak points.”

Get day-to-day insight, motivation and handle your inbox

Sign up for breaking news, reviews, viewpoint, top tech deals, and more.

I can’t state I disagree. In truth, DeepSeek’s answer was quite comparable, except it was not always discussing itself.

This does not add up

I think I have actually been clear about my DeepSeek skepticism. Everyone states it’s the most powerful and cheaply qualified AI ever (everybody except Alibaba), however I don’t understand if that’s true. To be reasonable, there’s an incredible quantity of detail on GitHub about DeekSeek’s open-source LLMs. They a minimum of appear to reveal that DeepSeek did the work.

But I do not believe they reveal how these models were trained. In either case, I do not have proof that DeepSeek trained its models on OpenAI or anyone else’s big language designs - or at least I didn’t until today.

Who are you?

DeepSeek is increasingly a secret wrapped inside a conundrum. There is some agreement on the fact that DeepSeek got here more fully formed and in less time than the majority of other models, consisting of Google Gemini, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and Claude AI.

Very few in the tech neighborhood trust DeepSeek’s apps on smartphones because there is no other way to understand if China is taking a look at all that timely data. On the other hand, [forum.batman.gainedge.org](https://forum.batman.gainedge.org/index.php?action=profile