For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a buddy - my extremely own “very popular” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It’s an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of writing, but it’s likewise a bit repetitive, wiki.whenparked.com and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet’s triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences start “as a leading innovation journalist …” - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there’s a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, systemcheck-wiki.de generally in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language model.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t - only Janet, who developed it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone’s name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, and created “entirely to bring humour and happiness”.

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a “customised gag gift”, and the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to broaden his range, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It’s designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It’s likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

“We should be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really suggest human developers’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators’ rights.

“This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It’s works of art. It’s records … The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that.”

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn’t stop the track’s developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

“I do not think making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes should be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals’s work without permission ought to be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex includes. “AI can be really powerful but let’s develop it ethically and fairly.”

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for bytes-the-dust.com their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use creators’ content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as “madness”.

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

“All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, [classicrock.awardspace.biz](http://classicrock.awardspace.biz/index.php?PHPSESSID=d84b231bd037e2b56e639221b197c2a3&action=profile